Jump to content

glintofpewter

Senior Members
  • Posts

    1,827
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

Posts posted by glintofpewter

  1. George, Paul,

     

    I agree. Our responses - primarily our conversations - is what will change our culture. To get stuck on any single factor - such as large capacity clips - is to miss all the other things that must also change.

     

    In another conversation I suggested that we ask our grand children to vote for presidents who will nominate Supreme Court justices who are not 'originalists'(if that is the correct word). The arc of change is that long.

     

    Dutch

  2. You, however, are made of 7 trillion cells, each an intricate structure in its own right, made of elements that were created in the heart of stars. Look into the night sky and you can experience light that, even though it travels fast enough to circumnavigate the equator nearly 4 times a second, has traveled for millions of years just to fall on your retina, across a space in which, we now speculate, every infinitesimal point might contain a tiny 7-dimensional Calabi-Yau manifold. I can't help thinking that to look at all this and to say that it isn't special enough betrays a very great sense of our own importance.

    dusktildawn,

     

    I couldn't agree more that the result of evolution is wondrous beyond understanding but the story I choose to tell about my personal relationship with ultimate reality is one of entities and internal and external relationships. If there is a logical fallacy that is important in my post it is mine: that of adding importance to my story by offering Birch's article and vocabulary. I would also reference Jakob Boehme who points to a yearning for relationship as the beginning and cause of all that is.I don't concur with Boehme that God's nature is fully developed shortly after one (static) becoming two (dynamic). (Do not be mis-lead by my using "God". God is not anything.) To the extent that we can speak of God at all I will say that God is evolving as creation is evolving. In the beginning there was no God and no universe, there was only the yearning for relationship. It is from this desire for relationship, that our sense of morality evolves.

     

    Dutch

  3. For liturgy that soars and Bruce Sanguin. His first book was "If Darwin Prayed"

     

    I also just found Drew Dellinger. Not a Christian but transcedant language.

     

    Rex Hunt for his prayers. C. Robert Mesle, Process Theology A Basic Introduction, Chalice Press, St. Louis, MO, 1993 (final chapter by John B. Cobb, Jr.)

     

    Dutch

     

  4.  

    "The laboratory of the mind" is a good metaphor but I can't help thinking that more would be needed than finding that some other people report similar experiences. The same could be said, after all, for experiences of alien abduction which seem to be similar for a number of people.

     

    Having the experience is subjective. Not being sure of what happened and finding a narrative to explain it is not. That is the left brain that always has to have an explanation even if it appears irrational to others. We do find people who agree with us if we must to feel affirmed.

     

    Materialistically one can say that it is in the right brain that we have "unitive" experiences of feeling one with (the universe). Panexperientialists feel that entities are related externally (a materialistic concern) and internally (often labelled subjective). It is this internal relationship that we recognize when we have a unitive experience.

     

     

     

    ... There are no substances. What exist are relations and these relations involve subjectivity-that is, some form of sentience-at the heart of all entities from protons to people.* The individual entities of the universe are occasions of experience.

     

    Radical indeed is the proposition that when you pursue your feelings down the evolutionary line you come to the conclusion that a feeling is a feeling of a feeling. Mind cannot arise from no mind. Subjectivity cannot emerge from something that is not subjective. Freedom and self-determination cannot arise from something that has no freedom.

     

     

    Process Thought: Its Value and Meaning To Me by Charles Birch

    http://www.ctr4process.org/about/process/MeansToMe.shtml

     

    * This does not mean that we are related to rocks. We are internally related to the atoms that make up the rocks.

     

    A long article about materialism, dualism and panexperientialism.

     

     

    Why I became a Panexperientialist by Charles Birch

    http://www.ctr4process.org/publications/Biblio/Papers/Charles%20Birch%20-%20Why%20I%20became%20a%20Panexperientialist.html

     

    This is too brief of an introduction to panexperientialism which is difficult for me to fully grasp but maybe it will help.

     

    Dutch

  5. I think democracy might mean being willing to be in conversation and not having such a hard position that I am not willing to arrive solutions that don't match mine. That I accept institutions in place to redress injustices and initiate change and that I will respectfully and peacefully protest when I must.

     

    When it is common for left or right to have such intractable positions that a conversation which leads to a common vision is impossible then democracy is undermined.

     

    Dutch

  6. I hope the Diane Feinstein proposal will go through at least, even if it doesn’t make as much difference as we’d like, it says we care more about protecting children than guns, we aren’t closing our eyes to this national epidemic.

     

    ...

    The US has gone through seismic shifts before, as in the abolition of slavery-- maybe we’re facing a similar challenge with the “two different worlds” on the issue of gun laws.

     

    I agree that some actions are only effective in their symbolism. I like the hope offered by hope in a seismic change.

     

    I will not have enough time to post all my thoughts now - after work we are packing for trip to North Carolina to visit my son - but on my long lay-overs I will.

     

    I started 4 different threads because I have come to believe that a successful response to these tragedies in a representive democracy can not rest on one or two factors. Passing an assault weapon ban or funding improved mental services must not be the only ways we measure our nations response.

     

    Part of our response is already happening and we should name it and claim it as part of a multi-faceted effort. The NRA's suggestion that we should have armed guards at schools is not off-the- wall. Many districts have already implemented such programs with creative funding. The NRA should support their suggestion by acceppting civil and criminal liability for their voluntary militia and offer grant money to school districts that can find none.

     

    Dutch

  7. I have been asked to take a stronger hand in moderating my thread here. I see little to object to. It is off topic to propose a ban on assault weapons - that belongs in the "the Weapon" thread. And it only takes one sentence unless there are qualifications.

     

    My biggest objection is that we are talking about what someone else should do. Especially our favorite "Most evangelical Christians" who are not monolithic as we make them out to be. If you do not agree name the person you don't agree with. Other wise find references for "most" "evangelical" "Christian". I doubt "evangelical lutheran" is included but that is the problem when we think out of prejudice. We fail to recognize the dignity of others.

     

    This thread is for positive proposals. I do think conversations about this topic even if there is disagreement can in fact be part of the solution. But that is liberal slant. I have a strongly held opinion. In democracy we work from consensus.

     

    Dutch

  8. It could point out how American western expansion glorified guns. It could talk about the limited historical context of the second amendment. It might compare statistics in the US with other nations, showing it doesn’t have to be this way. If there are weapons in the household make sure young children can’t get at them. Encourage kids to report signs of mental illness in others, etc.

    ------------------------------

     

    I like these suggestions. There is a current commercial by JPMorgan & Chase that is good. Without much tweaking it could include some of what you mention. Material would have to acceptable to gun rights people.Limited context for 2nd amendment might not get by them.

     

    Whether or not violent entertainment is causally relater to killing is not relevant. Suggesting that it is not good to think about killing others would help change the culture.

     

    Dutch

  9. Religious socialisation [behavior] encourages group cohesion, which might affect support for democracy. Religious beliefs trigger thoughts of traditionalism, security, conformity - which might act to reduce support for democracy.

     

    Clearly, religion and democracy are both complicated beasts, and so there is not going to be a straightforward relationship between the two!

     

    Religious belief and religious involvement have opposite effects on support for democracy

     

    Is this a contributing factor to polarization and a petition to deport Pers Morgan? Insistence on creedal beliefs?

     

    Dutch

  10. I have at least two responses.

     

    One

    I am on my phone and can't see the link for the video. It sounds like 'The Dance of the Fertile Universe'. It did all happen by chance but perhaps not by accident as Father Coyne suggests. One of the necessities that selects from the chance occurences is a desire for relationship. For example, out of billions of chance encounters two hydrogen atoms bump into each other under the right conditions and form a hydrogen molecule.

     

    In Process Theology there are internal and external relationships between all entities. The idea of internal relationships leads us to the ideas that we are all part of the universe and/or expressions of the universe evolving.

     

    Relationship requires two and we could say that God is becoming and evolving just as creation is. It takes two. Today is where we are in the relationship. As grampawombat said a year or two ago on this board and I paraphrase, "maybe some day God will evolve to the point that God is what we describe today."

     

    Two

    Life is accidental and we have no free will in the largest of meanings but in small ways we often live as if these were not true. "Life of Pi" speaks to this. Which story and in what circumstances would you tell? This is particularly important in the wake of calamanities. What story gets you through the night and leads to wholeness?

     

    Michael Dowd says the word "God" is how we tell stories about "ultimate reality mythically personified". So tell the stories that feed you and don't interrogate them as if they were science about external relationships. Experience the internal relationships that connect us and make us one with all that is becoming through chance and the necessity of relationship.

     

    You have no freewill. Live as if you do. Isn't that the challenge of existential despair?

     

    Dutch

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

terms of service