Jump to content

echalon

Members
  • Content Count

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

-2 Poor

About echalon

  • Rank
    Guest Member
  1. In reading some of the more recent posts on Point 3, I am surprised to see how much of the discussion is based on the Eucharist. When I read Point 3, I gravitate more towards the phrase "God's feast for all peoples". In my understanding, this goes well beyond a symbolic meal and would be more powerfully enacted by sitting down and sharing an actual, sustaining, and social meal with those in need. Not that the symbolic meal is a bad thing, but it is not enough. Is this idea simply unstated, or is this something that's more particular to me?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

terms of service