-
Posts
3,429 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
79
PaulS last won the day on September 7 2017
PaulS had the most liked content!
About PaulS
- Birthday 08/20/1968
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Mandurah Western Australia
Recent Profile Visitors
2,713 profile views
PaulS's Achievements
Master Contributing Member (9/9)
113
Reputation
-
Hi, this is Samia! Greetings from Cambodia!
PaulS replied to Samia Ung's topic in Introduce Yourself!
Hi Samia, Welcome to the Forum. Yes, it can seem to be a bit quiet in here at times, but our stats do show that hundreds of people are viewing posts on here throughout the month. I think many people may find information and support here, without actually declaring themselves or participating in the discussion threads. In any event, I hope you find the current forums and the backlog of interesting subjects that have been discussed here previously, both interesting and useful on your journey. Cheers Paul -
I see different people as different parts of the one environment which can create different wants across the whole.
-
I'm with you on the 'big picture' about everything being connected and 'as one'. But I don't think the logical conclusion then is that things such as 'wants' can't be different to other parts of the environment contained within the one. It's like there are a number of moving parts all within that one, and wants are just one of those moving parts.
-
In the broader sense it is, but I thought you were indicating 'environment' as separate or different to our wants. I do agree that 'environment' can encompass all.
-
I'm not convinced that the environment is responsible for changing our wants. For instance, in Australia we currently have a fair bit of debate going on around our National Day of Celebration on 26 January - Australia Day. This date was selected as it is the date the first fleets from England arrived on Australian Shores and raised the English flag as they claimed the land (irrespective of indigenous peoples already living on the continent). The date itself has changed throughout history. Currently the debate is about changing the date again to recognize that the arrival of England's Fleet to Australia wasn't much good news for the indigenous residents. But my point is that people are affecting the debate, and others are reflecting on those arguments. So more than likely what i see is people favouring a particular point of view that in turn will change the environment. Once that environment is changed, yes, others will probably change their thinking over time, but still, the change was initiated by people's thinking changing in the first place, I think.
-
It sounds to me like you're suggesting they would have liked to change their wants, but because life was harsh, it wasn't practical too. So when they did get a chance to change their wants (life got less harsh) then they affected the change they may have previously preferred?
-
Definitely our wants get re-shaped, but I think you're asking if it's our wants that change and subsequently the culture changes as a reflection of those changed wants? I tend to think it's both - maybe some people are ahead of the pack in changing their wants, but then that impacts culture, which then in turn changes and may make others reconsider their wants. I think.
-
And those 'wants' change over time. For instance, it used to be acceptable for a Jewish girl of 13 or 14 to be given into marriage by her father. Such an activity would be considered 'evil' today. Our understanding of 'evil' adapts and changes with our society and culture.
-
It certainly is, but I think it's also a term for us to share when trying to communicate behavior that we don't want in our community. For example, as a community, we can see the harm that pedophilia causes our community, so we tend to communicate that activity as 'evil' to make the point that we don't want that activity in our community.
-
I'm truly sorry you've lost such a good mate, Derek. I don't imagine it's easy, but I hope those memories of all the good times, offer you some comfort. How lucky were you to have such a dear friend!
-
I don't believe in evil either as a stand-alone 'thing'. What we call evil is simply a judgement we make. In our heads we determine whether we think something is evil - it doesn't make it so, it just aids in communication I guess.
-
I don't know if it is everything you do that is evil to another, but I'm sure a lot of what I do is considered evil by others. I'm guessing that could be opinions of others as to how I affect the environment, what my politics are, what my religious beliefs are, etc. Whether it be somebody in my own country or culture, or somebody from a different country or culture, yeah, I'm sure often what I don't think of as evil will be considered evil by another in some way, shape or form.
-
Most probably won't be seen after a couple of generations unfortunately, Rom! What's that saying about us ceasing to exist once our name passes across somebody's lips for the last time? I don't think it's necessarily a vanity though to feel that one would prefer to leave the world having contributed for the better, for those who are yet to come - not out of vanity's sake, but out of love.
-
@tariki I think your above post aligns somewhat with what I was trying to communicate in the thread below: I think 'suffering' comes from thinking life should be any different to how it is. Life is what it is - whether that be when we were Homo heidelbergensis and getting eaten by wild animals on the African savannah, or whether we're homo sapiens who get cancer. Sure, we can definitely use tools such as those proposed by the Buddah to help us deal with life, but I think the greatest tool of all is understanding that this life owes us nothing. Nobody is looking out for us. Nobody will be there for us when we die. There is no 'point' to our existence, but nonetheless, we exist. I think understanding life as "this too shall pass" might help us deal with the fact that often in life 'shit happens'. Maybe that was the Buddah's ultimate teaching - don't sweat it. It is what it is - enjoy the ride.
-
Just thought I'd share. These are where my thoughts around life and 'belief' are currently at: • One day I will die. Everybody does. Billions of people have died before me, and billions of people will die after me. • That doesn’t make my life meaningless - It matters to me whilst I am alive, and it matters a little bit to some others. • I could live my life with no regard for anybody else – but would that really make me happy? • For me, it seems that if I live a good life with good friends and good actions – then that life is much more enjoyable (for matters I consider in my control). I guess historically, some others have chosen a more selfish path. Perhaps that is just as rewarding for them, although inflicting pain (in one way or another) doesn’t seem a sensible way to have a happy life in the long run. • When I die I will cease to have personal consciousness. It will be like when I am asleep at night and not dreaming. I simply don’t know I am asleep, just as I won’t even know that I am dead. Kinda like what it was for me before I was born. • So how will my life matter? Well, in short, it won’t matter much in the big picture of things – nobody’s does. Sorry, but that’s the reality. We are a single life amongst billions, on a tiny speck of a planet, amongst zillions of other planets, contained within zillions of other galaxies, sitting within a possibly infinite universe, or universes. At best, my name will be forgotten in a few thousand years (if I was somehow amazing). Most likely, I will be forgotten in 3-4 generations. But I won't know if people remember my name, so it can only maybe of value to those who are living. • But whilst we are here now, amongst others, family, friends and strangers, it does matter. I have responsibilities, I need to feed myself and my family, raise my children, support my friends, pay bills, explore lands, enjoy breathing. · It's a nice thought to plan on leaving a ‘good’ legacy – grown children living a good life, a ‘good’ name, not too much damage in my wake, etc. But really, that is all for others, as I won’t know about it! I suspect my philosophy on life is close to what is called Optimistic Nihilism: Optimistic nihilism views the belief that there is no underlying meaning to life from a perspective of hope. It’s not that we’re doomed to live in a meaningless universe--it’s that we get the chance to experience ourselves and the universe we share. The optimistic nihilist looks at a world lacking meaning and purpose and sees the opportunity to create their own. Any thoughts on my take on life, or care to share your own 'world view' on this?