Taking Up Hobbies Later In Life? In your 20s? you can read this too.
#1
Posted 11 December 2005 - 11:55 PM
I am one of the old ladies on this forum :-). Anyway, it doesn't matter if you are in your 20s, as I suppose that isn't really young either.
I have taken on some new things here and there very seriously. Karate, saltwater fish tanks, dog activities (agility, etc).
Anyway, I have been interested in playing the recorder. I got a very cheap recorder and a teach yourself book and funny thing, we had a recorder orchestra play at church today. (One of the members of the orchestra belongs to the church, and they practice there.)
Anyway, I asked her about it. She said she would love to give me lessons (free) so I wouldn't end up picking up bad habits. She also says the alto recorder is easier and will loan me one. :-) I think it will be nice to do instead of so much tv.
--des
#4
Posted 12 December 2005 - 09:45 AM
des, on Dec 11 2005, 11:55 PM, said:
Oh, puhleaze! Aren't they calling the 40's the "new 20's" now?
Anyway, you're far more open-minded than most of the 20 and 30 year old "whipper snappers" I know anyway. The only age that really counts is in your head.
Seriously though, I think any effort to replace the mindless chatterbox with activities that really flex the brain, will pay off big dividends both now and later in life. My grandmother, for example, turned 84 this year, and still reads voraciously on all kinds of different topics, gets involved in local activities, takes classes, was active in the affairs of the local library for many years, etc. She still has an open mind about issues in society, culture, politics, and religion, long after everybody else on either side of my family has turned into a broken record. (My parents' generation included.)
#5
Posted 12 December 2005 - 12:34 PM
flow....
#6
Posted 12 December 2005 - 11:17 PM
I work very hard, and find tv relaxing. I do read a lot, etc. but find at the end of a *very* long day and lots of prep work for the next that tv is just relaxing, etc. I was never watching this much but this job seems to take a lot out of me. (I think in some ways it is the system, not the kids.)
Music would be nice. I'm not too musically minded though. Well we'll see. I can play many keys on the soprano recorder.-- though the lower notes are difficult. I got a simple Christmas music book today. (At least I will recognize should I play them right.)
The teacher doesn't want me to develop bad habits that I will need to break later-- so I'll try not to take it too seriously. Yet. I won't buy an alto til I start the lessons.
--des
#7
Posted 13 December 2005 - 05:34 PM
des, on Dec 12 2005, 11:17 PM, said:
Maybe I was projecting my mom, who can't even fall asleep without the tender glow of the tube bathing her body in its incandescent glow. But I definitely understand that TV has some positive value.
I commend you for trying to make music lessons work on an adult schedule! It's hard enough to keep up on practicing when you're in junior high and all you have to worry about is your homework and whether Jenny knows that you have a crush on her. We already sing and play the piano to John, and we like to sit him in our lap and let him plunk on the keys. So much fun to watch!
#8
Posted 13 December 2005 - 11:22 PM
Of course, one thing about picking something up at my age is that I don't really care if mom thinks I do well and I only need to do it if I want to.
I am hoping I won't be picking up too many bad habits, my teacher was very clear on this! She stated that her ideal student would be one who can read music (me) and who has no bad habits to break. But I can hardly just sit and let it stare at me. I am thinking I might get the alto one anyway. After all, she has worked with people who have had YEARS of bad habits to break. All I will have is a few weeks. :-)
My biggest challenge at the moment is hitting middle C. Yikes this is hard.
--des
#9
Posted 24 December 2005 - 04:41 PM
--des
#11
Posted 26 December 2005 - 07:24 PM
My sister was rolling her eyes about it, but my best friend said I wasn't so bad. (of course she is my best friend and my sister is, well, my sister). My mom liked it but she has dementia. So I am getting rather mixed reviews. :-)
Also it does sound like a, well, $5 plastic instrument. ;-)
--des
#12
Posted 08 January 2006 - 12:34 AM
(I have also discovered Sudoku. YIKES.)
--des
#14
Posted 08 January 2006 - 01:06 AM
AletheiaRivers, on Jan 8 2006, 12:40 AM, said:
Quote
NOW I am impressed!
I can never do that two times in a row. I'm pretty sure (but not absolutely) I've done it once. It is all random for me. In one of my classes we had a maze we had to do (too hard to describe). You do it 10 times. In theory the number of mistakes you make each time drops. On about number 5 I got it without any mistakes then I made mistakes on 6, 7, 8, got 9 right and made mistakes on 10. *sigh* Most people once they got it they did the rest w/o error. It is the same with that peg game!
Never heard of Sudoku
#15
Posted 08 January 2006 - 01:21 AM
Oh, I hadn't heard of Soduku until recently. Google it and click on the first link. WOW.
#16
Posted 09 January 2006 - 12:33 AM
I have a friend who is very turned off by the nos. But there are shape ones and she could do these instantly.
I've thought of what makes games addictive and it is what I will call the "snap factor". IF you have a mildly obsessive type personality (and many people do), you like things "just so". When you can get things exactly right they "snap into place". Sudoku fits the snap thing as there is only one right answer, there are no words that you might not know and you can always find a puzzle easy or hard enough for you, so you can always finish it (if it is in your range of difficulty). So when you get it the numbers snap into place. I think this is the same thing that makes me a jigsaw fan. Other games that might fit in this are Tetris, Breakout, Spider Solitaire ( a little more luck on the later though).
OTOH, I am not too crazy about the peg game (Hi Q was one manufactors name). You might find one of these in a set of games in a thrift store.
I think it is sometimes in sets with checkers, chess, etc. I got one in a set with for something like $2. I pick these up for work for those times when we let the kids play games once in awhile. I think this game might have that snap factor as well, but there are many times that I can't get just one other peg left.
--des
#18
Posted 09 January 2006 - 09:14 AM
#19
Posted 09 January 2006 - 10:28 AM
Quote
Just call me Adrian Monk.
Seriously, because of your saying this and because of what Fred said about Soduku, I think I'll be making a B&N run this weekend for a puzzle book.
Great, just what I need. Like I don't have enough reading to take up my time right now.
#20
Posted 09 January 2006 - 11:35 PM
don't say I didn't warn you about Sudoku! It is highly addictive though maybe not as bad as Spider Solitaire, that one must be the addictive game of all time. OTOH, there was a game I played many years ago called Wazte. I haven't seen it since, which is just as well for getting anythign at all done in life. It was kind of slower, more glitzy horizontal Tetrisish/ Breakout meld thing. You cleared off some tiles and you got a newer set of brighter more interesting cooler tiles that cleared in a cooler way. Reminds me of a certain Star Trek next gen episode.
But yes, Sukoku is cool, very simple and elegant in a way, as Fred describes. I am doing it more or less on a elimination process but I can sometimes kind of predict what might be where based on some other thinking style (other than deduction).
Good luck.
--des

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote
