Lolly, on Apr 21 2005, 09:13 AM, said:
In zen it is suggested that nothing is permanent, all is changing all the time. If we posit a God that includes all of creation, I don't see how it can be any other way except that this God is changing, too.
Perhaps we're too quick to assign the dualistic qualities of good and bad to the idea of permanence/impermanence.
I think many people tend to feel that a permanent quality of some sort would be "good"... that is to say, it would provide some sort of haven from the unpredictibility of life. Yet, I have found that when things are really observed, I am hard pressed to find a single thing that is not subject to change.
Accepting that change is perhaps the only true constant means accepting that, like it or not, we really do walk our respective paths in uncertainty, with no real permanent thing to attach to.
I think that, perhaps, this desire for permanence is what happens to religions as they evolve. We want to codify tradition into some set of unchanging rules and forms, because we feel that if we have something to hold on to that doesn't change, we'll find or create a safety zone in that religious practice.
So we build up institutions to try to clarify what "should be" and to establish rules and protocols with the assumption that there can exist some really True and unchanging Truth that is the same from all perspectives, throughout time. These rules and protocols become ossified, etched into stone, accepted unquestioningly. We seek a safe haven in them and in so doing we shun the unfolding, everchanging experience of living that is available to us right now, in every moment.
Okay, I'm rambling here... just some thoughts on impermanence and change which came to mind today as I read this thread.
Lolly, I love your rambling. You can ramble here all you want as far as I am concerned.

Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote
